- Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, although improvements have been made.
- Once septic shock is present the mortality can be as high as 50%. [Wolfier, 2008]
- Guidelines published have emphasized the need for:
- Early recognition and
- Rapid fluid administration.
- Keep your Differential open!
- While ordering empiric antibiotics, consider the other causes of SHOCK in children.
- The child with fluid-refractory shock deserves a second and third consideration for the other possible culprits!
- Use your bedside Ultrasound [Doniger, 2010; ALIEM]
Be Aggressive and Rapid!
- The goal of the 1st hour of resuscitation is to restore normal perfusion, blood pressure and heart rate. [Brierley, 2009]
- Vascular access needs to be rapidly attained.
- Large bore peripheral IVs or IOs.
- Central lines play a role in the management of the critically ill, but should NOT divert attention awayfrom more time sensitive tasks.
- Rapidly bolus fluids
- Do not hang to gravity or on a “pump.”
- Use syringe pushes or pressure bags
- Children commonly will require 40-60 ml/kg in the 1st hour, but may require more (some say 200 ml/kg in 1st hour in right clinical setting). [Brierley, 2009]
- Don’t forget about Glucose!
- SERIOUSLY… always think about glucose like you are Homer Simpson thinking about donuts!
- Vascular access needs to be rapidly attained.
Vasopressors can be Started Peripherally
- Do not hesitate to start vasopressors.
- Children with fluid-refractory shock tend to respond to inotropes. [Ceneviva, 1998]
- Reversing shock is associated with better survival.
- Common perception is that vasoactive medications (vasopressors) need to be give via central line.
- In an ideal setting, this is reasonable. That 1st hour of critical illness is often not ideal.
- There is no data clarifying whether one vasopressor is more harmful when given peripherally than another. [Brierley, 2009]
- Epinephrine has been shown to be safe and effectivewhen given via peripheral IV or IO in the setting of Septic Shock. [Ramaswamy, 2016; Ventura, 2015]
- Time is critical; central lines aren’t easy in children; PIVs and IOs work just fine!
Epinephrine vs Dopamine
- Short answer = there is no perfect vasopressor and no perfect answer.
- Traditional teaching and prior guidelines have listed Dopamine as 1st line therapy. [Brierley, 2009]
- Adult literature has raised concerns about safety of Dopamine [De Backer, 2010]
- Dopamine is known to not be as effective in young children (<6 months). [Brierley, 2009]
- Not many pediatric studies compare vasopressors, but today two small, RTC trials exist: Ramaswamy, 2016; Ventura, 2015
- Both compared peripheral Epinephrine vs peripheral Dopamine as 1st choice.
- For children with Fluid-Refractory Shock:
- Epinephrine was more effective in resolving the refractory shock
- Epinephrine resolved shock more rapidly than dopamine
- Survival rates were higher in cohorts receiving epinephrine. [Ventura, 2015]
Ramaswamy KN1, Singhi S, Jayashree M, Bansal A, Nallasamy K. Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Dopamine and Epinephrine in Pediatric Fluid-Refractory Hypotensive Septic Shock. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Sep 23. PMID: 27673385. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]
Ventura AM1, Shieh HH, Bousso A, Góes PF, de Cássia F O Fernandes I, de Souza DC, Paulo RL, Chagas F, Gilio AE. Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Dopamine Versus Epinephrine as First-Line Vasoactive Drugs in Pediatric Septic Shock. Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2292-302. PMID: 26323041. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]
Sankar J1, Das RR, Jain A, Dewangan S, Khilnani P, Yadav D, Dubey N. Prevalence and outcome of diastolic dysfunction in children with fluid refractory septic shock–a prospective observational study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov;15(9):e370-8. PMID: 25230313. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]
De Backer D1, Biston P, Devriendt J, Madl C, Chochrad D, Aldecoa C, Brasseur A, Defrance P, Gottignies P, Vincent JL; SOAP II Investigators. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):779-89. PMID: 20200382. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]
Brierley J, Carcillo JA, Choong K, Cornell T, Decaen A, Deymann A, Doctor A, Davis A, Duff J, Dugas MA, Duncan A, Evans B, Feldman J, Felmet K, Fisher G, Frankel L, Jeffries H, Greenwald B, Gutierrez J, Hall M, Han YY, Hanson J, Hazelzet J, Hernan L, Kiff J, Kissoon N, Kon A, Irazuzta J, Lin J, Lorts A, Mariscalco M, Mehta R, Nadel S, Nguyen T, Nicholson C, Peters M, Okhuysen-Cawley R, Poulton T, Relves M, Rodriguez A, Rozenfeld R, Schnitzler E, Shanley T, Kache S, Skippen P, Torres A, von Dessauer B, Weingarten J, Yeh T, Zaritsky A, Stojadinovic B, Zimmerman J, Zuckerberg A. Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007 update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):666-88. PMID: 19325359. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]
Wolfler A1, Silvani P, Musicco M, Antonelli M, Salvo I; Italian Pediatric Sepsis Study (SISPe) group. Incidence of and mortality due to sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock in Italian Pediatric Intensive Care Units: a prospective national survey. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Sep;34(9):1690-7. PMID: 18500425. [PubMed] [Read by QxMD]