52 in 52 – #26: The EXACT Trial

Welcome back to the “52 in 52” series. This collection of posts features recently published must-know articles. Post #26 looks at oxygen targets in the post-ROSC patient after OHCA.


Author: Dan O’Conor, MD (Resident, Emergency Medicine Physician, San Antonio, TX) and Brannon Inman, MD (Chief Resident, Emergency Medicine Physician, San Antonio, TX) // Reviewed by: Alex Koyfman, MD (@EMHighAK); and Brit Long, MD (@long_brit)


Effect of Lower vs Higher Oxygen Saturation Targets on Survival to Hospital Discharge Among Patients Resuscitated After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AKA: The EXACT Randomized Clinical Trial

 

Question: 

In patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) from a presumed cardiac cause who have obtained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), does targeting a lower oxygenation saturation in the early phase of post-ROSC care improve survival?

 

Study design:

  • A multi-center parallel-group block-randomized controlled trial
    • Patients and outcome assessors blinded

PICO:

Population:

  • Included patients in 2 EMS systems and 15 hospitals in Victoria and South Australia, Australia from December 11, 2017- August 11, 2020
  • Included adult patients (above age 18) with OHCA from presumed cardiac cause with subsequent ROSC
  • Additional inclusion criteria:
    • unconscious after ROSC
    • advanced airway (endotracheal tube or supraglottic airway)
    • transport planned to a participating hospital
    • maintained SpO2 >95% while receiving 10L/min supplemental O2 or FiO2 100%
  • Exclusion criteria:
    • Pregnancy
    • Evidence of non-cardiac cause of arrest

Intervention:

  • Oxygen restriction: Supplemental oxygen titration prior to ICU arrival to achieve SpO2 90-94%

Comparator:

  • Liberal oxygen: Supplemental oxygen titration prior to ICU arrival to achieve SpO2 98-100%

Outcome:

  • No significant difference in the primary outcome (survival to hospital discharge)
  • Statistically significant increased risk of hypoxic episodes (SpO2 <90%) in the intervention group

Randomization:

  • Treatment arms were fairly well-balanced.

Take away:

  • This was a negative trial, although it was limited by early termination prior to target enrollment due to the COVID pandemic.
  • There were increased rates of sustained hypoxia in the intervention group, although this “adverse effect” is an oxygen range immediately adjacent to the target range.
  • Strengths:
    • This study includes patient-oriented outcomes and outcomes that are directly related to the hypothesized mechanism (CPC neurologic assessment scale as a secondary outcome when the premise is that standard care causes reperfusion brain injury).
  • This study contrasts with prior preliminary studies suggesting a benefit of conservative oxygen strategies.
  • Authors note that the precise oxygen titration was difficult with the equipment available pre-hospital.
    • Mean SpO2 in the intervention group was 97% (range 94-99%) at ED arrival despite a goal of 90-94%.
    • This decreases the likelihood that if a difference exists between groups that it could be detected by this study, although there was a noticeable difference in PaO2 at ED arrival.
      • Median 95mmHg in the intervention group vs 130mmHg in the standard group without any PaO2 <60 in the intervention group which suggests that hyperoxia was in fact mitigated in the intervention group without causing hypoxia.
    • The only subgroup in which survival varied was patients with or without bystander CPR. This may support the theory that patients with shorter downtime/hypoxia are at less risk of hypoxia and therefore do not stand to benefit as significantly from measures aimed to reduce reperfusion injury. This should be viewed as hypothesis-generating at this stage.

 

My take:

I will not intentionally target hyperoxia, and it is not clear whether 90-94% is inferior or superior to 98-100% based on this trial. There is likely a greater number of desaturation episodes when targeting 90-94%, but it is not clear this is associated with patient harm.

 

Reference:

  1. Bernard SA, Bray JE, Smith K, et al. Effect of Lower vs Higher Oxygen Saturation Targets on Survival to Hospital Discharge Among Patients Resuscitated After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The EXACT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022;328(18):1818-1826. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.17701

Share This:

1 thought on “52 in 52 – #26: The EXACT Trial”

  1. Pingback: Quiz 178, February 3, 2023 – The FOAMed Quiz

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

emDOCs subscribes to the Free Open Access Meducation (FOAMed) initiative. Our goal is to inform the global EM community with timely and high-yield content about what providers like YOU are seeing and doing daily in your local ED.

WRITE FOR EMDOCS

We are actively recruiting both new topics and authors.
This project is rolling and you can submit an idea or write-up anytime!
Contact us at editors@emdocs.net

news, headlines, newsletter

Join our Newsletter

Keep up to date on all of the latest new articles, studies, and Podcasts.
This podcast episode is all about what prehospital providers should do to get these agitated children safely to the ed.