practice updates

Unstable Sepsis: Airway First? Not Always

Intubation, especially in the septic and critically ill patient, can, by itself, cause hemodynamic abnormalities and/or hypoxemia and hypercapnea. In some situations, it may be important to make sure that the patient is adequately prepared for intubation, both from hemodynamic and pre-oxygenation standpoints. This is a brief review of some suggestions when intubating the very ill patient in the emergency department.

Unstable Sepsis: Airway First? Not Always Read More »

Controversies in Pulmonary Embolism Imaging and Treatment of Subsegmental Thromboembolic Disease

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is classically a life-threatening diagnosis, often considered in the work-up of patients with chest pain or dyspnea. Initial mortality rates of missed, untreated PE has been quoted as high as 26%, based on a 1960 study. This disease is common, with 400,000 patients affected with nonfatal PE and another 200,000 patients in the U.S. dying each year from this disease. PE is the third most common cause of death in cardiovascular disease after myocardial infarction and stroke.

Controversies in Pulmonary Embolism Imaging and Treatment of Subsegmental Thromboembolic Disease Read More »

Penetrating Trauma: What We Miss and How We Can Improve

The patient with penetrating trauma can present with many different injuries. The majority of injuries are easily diagnosed. What about the patient with pneumothorax, diaphragmatic injury, ureteral injury, and hollow viscus injury? These are not so easy to diagnose, and delay in management can cause significant morbidity and mortality. This post provides pearls and pitfalls for these conditions.

Penetrating Trauma: What We Miss and How We Can Improve Read More »

Clinical Decision Rules Series Part 2: CDR Implementation

There are often multiple roadblocks to incorporating a CDR into clinical practice. These can be broken into the 1) individual provider and 2) the institution.

1. Emergency physicians are a rare breed, and many of us do not appreciate suggestions on how to practice. Individual providers vary in many regards: training, knowledge, experience, and gestalt. Workups and treatments can significantly differ among providers. With CDRs, physicians may be hesitant to apply these rules to their own practice. They may feel the rules are too complex, too difficult to remember, or detract valuable time from patient care. Providers often feel that gestalt or experience is better than rules.

2. Institutions may have habits or a culture for particular conditions that may make it difficult to apply a rule. Tradition or consultant availability may color the use of CDRs. Unfortunately, the medico-legal environment or funding can also play a large role in the use, or lack thereof, for CDRs.

Clinical Decision Rules Series Part 2: CDR Implementation Read More »

24 hour towing company in tampa. Header bitcoin depot. Southwest florida market report – february 2026.